narshin



اسلاید 301
There are four commonly used nonrandom
designs, each based on a different
consideration, which are commonly used in
both qualitative and quantitative research.
اسلاید 302
1- The Convenience Sample
 Find some people that are easy to find
 the process of including whoever happens to be
available at the time
– Examples:
• Man on the street”
• Agricultural student in the library
• Volunteer samples
• Patient coming to OP
 …called accidental” or haphazard (hapˈhazərd)” sampling
اسلاید 303
disadvantages…
…difficulty in determining how much of the
effect (dependent variable) results from
the cause (independent variable)
اسلاید 304
2. Purposive sampling:
the process whereby the
researcher selects a sample based
on experience or knowledge of the
group to be sampled.
…called judgment” sampling
disadvantages…
…potential for inaccuracy in the
researcher’s criteria and resulting
sample selections.
اسلاید 305
3- The Snowball Sample
Typically used in qualitative research.
Recruit one respondent, who identifies others, who identify others,….
1. Find a few people that are relevant to your topic.
2. Ask them to refer you to more of them.
اسلاید 306
4- The Quota Sample
روش سهمیه ای
 the process whereby a researcher gathers data from
individuals possessing identified characteristics and
quotas
1. Determine what the population looks like in terms of
specific qualities.
2. Create quotas” based on those qualities.
3. Select people for each quota.
اسلاید 309
STEP IV Selecting a Sample
 Sampling in qualitative research
As the main aim in qualitative enquiries is to explore the
diversity, sample size and sampling strategy do not play a
significant role in the selection of a sample. If selected
carefully, diversity can be extensively and accurately
described on the basis of information obtained even from one
individual.
اسلاید 310
STEP IV Selecting a Sample
 All non-probability sampling designs – purposive,
judgmental, expert, accidental and snowball – can also be
used in qualitative research with two differences:
– 1. In quantitative studies you collect information from a
predetermined number of people but, in qualitative research, you
do not have a sample size in mind. Data collection based upon a
predetermined sample size and the saturation point distinguishes
their use in quantitative and qualitative research.
– 2. In quantitative research you are guided by your desire to select a
random sample, whereas in qualitative research you are guided by
your judgement as to who is likely to provide you with the ‘best’
information.
اسلاید 311
STEP IV Selecting a Sample
 The concept of saturation point in qualitative research
In qualitative research data is usually collected to a point
where you are not getting new information or it is negligible –
the data saturation point. This stage determines the sample
size.
اسلاید 313
How to Write a Research Proposal
The research proposal in quantitative and
qualitative research:
– In both cases you use a similar structure. The main
difference is in the proposed procedures and methodologies
for undertaking the research endeavor.
– A research proposal’s main function is to detail the
operational plan for obtaining answers to your research
questions. In doing so it ensures and reassures the reader of
the validity of the methodology for obtaining answers to
your research questions accurately and objectively.
اسلاید 314
How to Write a Research Proposal
 A research proposal must tell you, your
research supervisor and reviewers the
following information about your study:
– what you are proposing to do;
– how you plan to find answers to what you are
proposing;
– why you selected the proposed strategies of
investigation.
اسلاید 315
Contents of a research proposal
 an introduction, including a brief literature review;
 theoretical framework that underpins your study;
 conceptual framework which constitutes the basis of your study;
 objectives or research questions of your study;
 hypotheses to be tested, if applicable;
 study design that you are proposing to adopt;
 setting for your study; (organisation, agency or community in which you will conduct your study)
 research instrument(s) you are planning to use;
 sampling design and sample size;
 ethical issues involved and how you propose to deal with them;
 data processing procedures;
 proposed chapters of the report;
 problems and limitations of the study;
 proposed time-frame for the project. (Work schedule)
اسلاید 316
Example: 1-Introduction
 Suppose that you plan to study the relationship between academic
achievement and social environment. The preamble/introduction
would include the following:
– The role of education in our society.
– Major changes in the philosophy of education over time.
– Factors affecting attitudes towards education.
– The development of education in … (country).
– Trends in education participation rates in … (country) with particular reference to
the
– region in which the study is being carried out.
– Changing educational values.
– Role of parents and peers in academic achievement.
– Impact of social environment on academic achievement.
– etc.
اسلاید 317
2- Problem
 What theories have been developed to explain the relationship between
academic achievement and social environment?
 What is the relationship between educational achievement and social
environment: what theoretical model will be the basis of your study?
 What do previous theories and researches have to say regarding the
components of the theoretical model and academic achievement? For
example, the relationship between academic achievement and:
– — the self-esteem and aspirations/motivation of a student;
– — peer group influence;
– — parental involvement and its relationship with their socioeconomic status;
– — the motivation and interest of students in the subject;
– — employment prospects;
– — relationship with a teacher;
– — etc.
اسلاید 3
3- Objectives of the study
 Main objective:
 To examine the relationship between academic
achievement and social environment.
 Sub-objectives:
– 1. To find out the relationship, if any, between self-esteem and a
student’s academic achievement at school.
– 2. To ascertain the association between parental involvement in a
student’s studies and his/her academic achievement at school.
– 3. To examine the links between a student’s peer group and
academic achievement.
– 4. To explore the relationship between academic achievement and
the attitude of a student towards teachers.
اسلاید 319
Hypotheses to be tested
 H1 = A student’s self-esteem and academic achievement at
school are positively correlated.
 H2 = The greater the parental involvement in a student’s
studies, the higher the academic achievement.
 H3 = A student’s attitude towards teachers is positively
correlated with his/her academic achievement in that
subject.
 Hi = etc.
اسلاید 320
4- Study design
 It is proposed that the study will be carried out in two government high schools in the
metropolitan area. The principals of the schools most accessible to the researcher will be
contacted to explain the purpose of the study and the help needed from the school, and
to seek their permission for the students to participate in the study. As the constraints of
time and resources do not permit the researcher to select more than two schools,
negotiations with other schools will cease when two schools agree to participate in the
study. It is proposed to select Year 9 students as the academic achievement of students
in Years 8 and 10 could be affected by factors unique to them. Year 8 students may be
experiencing anxiety as a result of having just made the transition to a new system. The
motivation of students in Year 10 could be affected by their being at the stage in their
education where they must decide if they will stay on at school. In order to control the
variance attributable to the gender of a student it is proposed to select only male
students. Once the principal of a school agrees to allow the study to be carried out, the
researcher will brief the teacher in charge about the study and its relevance, and will
arrange a date and time for administering the questionnaire. When the students are
assembled, ready to participate in the study, the researcher will explain its purpose and
relevance, and then distribute the questionnaire. The researcher will remain with the
class to answer any questions the students might have.
اسلاید 321
5- Sampling
 The selection of schools will be done primarily through
quota sampling. Schools will be selected on the basis of
their geographical proximity to the researcher. The
researcher will prepare a list of schools, in rank order, of
accessibility. Once two schools agree to participate in the
study, negotiations with other schools will cease. All Year
9 male students will constitute the study population. It is
expected that the sample will not exceed 100 students.
اسلاید 323
Considering Ethical Issues in Data Collection
 Ethical issues to consider concerning Research
participants:
– Collecting information
– Seeking consent
– Providing incentives
– Seeking sensitive information (questions on marital status,
drug use and shoplifting …)
– The possibility of causing harm to participants (not only
hazardous medical experiments but also any social research that might involve such things as
discomfort, anxiety angˈzī-itē, harassment, invasion of privacy, or demeaning procedures)
– Maintaining confidentiality
اسلاید 324
Considering Ethical Issues in Data Collection
Ethical issues to consider relating to the
researcher:
– Avoiding bias
– Provision or deprivation of a treatment
– Using inappropriate research methodology
– Incorrect reporting
– Inappropriate use of the information
اسلاید 325
Considering Ethical Issues in Data
Collection
Ethical issues regarding the sponsoring
organisation
– Restrictions imposed by the sponsoring
organisation (They may select the methodology, prohibit the publication
of ‘what was found’ or impose other restrictions on the research that may stand in
the way of obtaining and disseminating accurate information.)
– The misuse of information (such as using your research
for justifying management decisions when the research findings do
not support them)
اسلاید 327
Processing data
Part one: Data processing in quantitative
studies
1. Editing
2. Coding
اسلاید 328
Processing data
 Editing: The first step in processing your data is to ensure
that the data is ‘clean’ – that is, free from inconsistencies
and incompleteness.
 Editing consists of checking the completed research
instruments to identify and minimise, as far as possible,
errors, incompleteness, misclassification and gaps in the
information obtained from the respondents.
 There are two ways of editing the data:
– 1. examine all the answers to one question or variable at a time;
– 2. examine all the responses given to all the questions by one
respondent at a time.
اسلاید 329
Processing data
 Coding
 The method of coding is largely dictated by two
considerations:
– 1. the way a variable has been measured (measurement
scale) in your research instrument (e.g. if a response to
a question is descriptive, categorical or quantitative);
– 2. the way you want to communicate the findings about
a variable to your readers.
اسلاید 330
 For coding quantitative and qualitative data in
quantitative studies you need to go through the
following steps:
– Step I developing a code book;
– Step II pre-testing the code book;
– Step III coding the data;
– Step IV verifying the coded data.
اسلاید 331
Developing a code book
– A code book provides a set of rules for
assigning numerical values to answers obtained
from respondents.
 Pre-testing the code book
Once a code book is designed, it is important to pre-test it for any
problems before you code your data. A pre-test involves selecting a
few questionnaires/interview schedules and actually coding the
responses to ascertain any problems in coding.
اسلاید 332
Coding the data
– There are three ways of doing this:
• 1. coding on the questionnaires/interview schedule
itself, if space for coding was provided at the time of
constructing the research instrument;
• 2. coding on separate code sheets that are available
for purchase;
• 3. coding directly into the computer using a program
such as SPSS, SAS.
اسلاید 333
Verifying the coded data
– Once the data is coded, select a few research
instruments at random and record the responses to
identify any discrepancies in coding. Continue to verify
coding until you are sure that there are no
discrepancies.
اسلاید 334
 Developing a frame of analysis
 A frame of analysis should specify:
– which variables you are planning to analyse;
– how they should be analysed;
– what cross-tabulations you need to work out;
– which variables you need to combine to construct your major
concepts or to develop indices (in formulating a research problem
concepts are changed to variables – at this stage change them back
to concepts);
– which variables are to be subjected to which statistical procedures.
اسلاید 335
Analyzing quantitative data manually
– Coded data can be analysed manually or with the help
of a computer. If the number of respondents is
reasonably small, there are not many variables to
analyse, and you are neither familiar with a relevant
computer program nor wish to learn one, you can
manually analyse the data.
اسلاید 336
 Part two: Data processing in qualitative studies
How you process and analyze data in a qualitative study depends
upon how you plan to communicate the findings.
Broadly, there are three ways in which you can write about your
findings in qualitative research:
(1) developing a narrative to describe a situation, episode, event or
instance; (there is no analysis per se)
(2) identifying the main themes that emerge from your field notes or
transcription of your in-depth interviews and writing about them,
quoting extensively in verbatim format; (content analysis)
(3) quantify the main themes in order to provide their prevalence and
thus significance. (content analysis)
اسلاید 337
– Content analysis
• Content analysis means analysing the contents of
interviews or observational field notes in order to
identify the main themes that emerge from the
responses given by your respondents or the
observation notes made by you.
اسلاید 338
 Part two: Data processing in qualitative studies
– Content analysis involves a number of steps:
1. Identify the main themes
2. Assign codes to the main themes
3. Classify responses under the main themes
4. Integrate themes and responses into the text of your
report.
Content analysis in qualitative research – an example (it
will be explained after the semester)
اسلاید 341
More specific steps in the analysis
process
 Exploring the database
 Coding the data
 Developing findings - a description and themes
 (Re) presenting the description and themes
 Interpreting the findings
 Validating the findings
اسلاید 342
How do we first explore the database?
Obtain a general sense of the data
Write down memos on hard copy
Think about the organization of the data
Consider whether more data are needed
اسلاید 344
How do we divide the text into
segments? (actual coding)
 Transcribe the interview
 Initially read through for general meaning
 Determine coding frame (sentence, paragraph, or phrase) and
determine what the person is saying in the coding frame
 Assign code labels in left margin
– Use participants’ words as codes, when possible (in vivo codes)
– Do not over code (10-15 codes per 20 pages)
– Stay away from interpreting comments
 Look for overlap among codes
 Combine codes into 5-7 themes
اسلاید 345
 Here is an example of several codes applied to data from an interview
transcript in which a high school senior describes his favorite teacher. The
codes are based on what outcomes the student receives from his mentor. Note
that one of the codes is taken directly from what the participant himself says
and is placed in quotation marks – this is called an In Vivo Code:
اسلاید 346
 A code can sometimes summarize or condense data, not
simply reduce it. In the excerpt below, a mother describes
her teenage son’s troubled school years. The codes emerge
from the perspective of middle- and junior high school
years as a difficult period for most youth. They are not
specific types of codes; they are first impression” phrases
derived from an open ended process called Initial Coding:
اسلاید 348
 Themes are broad categories of information (codes
grouped together)
 Themes can describe a setting
 Themes can describe what occurred
 In the 5-7 themes, have some be: a) what you would
expect; b) what you would not expect (unusual
themes)
 Themes can also be related (chronology, grounded
theory model)
اسلاید 351
Let’s practice the coding procedures using a
sample two-page transcript on the topic of
how department chairs balance their
personal and professional lives.
 Qualitative Data Analysis, pp:179-Sharan
B. Merriam
اسلاید 355
 There are four ways of communicating and
displaying the analyzed data:
– 1. text;
– 2. tables;
– 3. graphs; and
– 4. statistical measures
اسلاید 356
Writing a research report
 The last step in the research process is writing the research report.
 In a way, writing your report is the most crucial step in the research
process as it communicates the findings to your research supervisor
and readers.
 A badly written report can spoil all the hard work you have put into
your research study.
 Styles of research writing vary markedly among researchers but all
research reports must be written clearly and concisely.
 There are different ways of referencing and of writing a bibliography.
You need to select the system that is acceptable to your discipline and
university
اسلاید 357
 Writing in quantitative and qualitative research differs to
the extent that in qualitative research your style is
descriptive and narrative, whereas in quantitative research,
in addition to being descriptive, it is also analytical and
every assertion is supported by empirical evidence
gathered through the investigation.
 Before you start writing the research report, develop an
outline of the different chapters and their contents.
اسلاید 358
Mixed methods Research
 Often, it is better to use more than one method….
– Quantitative data can reveal generalizable information for a large group of
people
– These data often fail to provide specific answers, reasons, explanations or
examples
– Qualitative research provides data about meaning and context regarding
the people and environments of study
– Findings are often not generalizable because of the small numbers &
narrow range of participants
– Both methods have strengths and weaknesses
– When used together, these methods can be complimentary
اسلاید 359
 Mixed methods research is a methodology for conducting research that
involves collecting, analyzing, and integrating (or mixing) quantitative
and qualitative research (and data) in a single study or a longitudinal
program of inquiry. The purpose of this form of research is that both
qualitative and quantitative research, in combination, provide a better
understanding of a research problem or issue than either research
approach alone.
اسلاید 362
In this approach, a researcher collects both quantitative and qualitative
data, analyzes them separately, and then compares the results to see if
the findings confirm or disconfirm each other.
 The key idea with this design is to collect both forms of data using the
same or parallel variables, constructs, or concepts. In other words, if
the concept of self-esteem is being measured quantitatively, the same
concept is asked during the qualitative data collection process, such as
in an open-ended interview.
اسلاید 366
Types of mixed methods designs
 The intent of the strategy is to develop better
measurements with specific samples of populations and to
see if data from a few individuals (in qualitative phase) can
be generalized to a large sample of a population (in
quantitative phase).
 For example, the researcher would first collect focus group
data, analyze the results, develop an instrument based on
the results, and then administer it to a sample of a
population.
اسلاید 290
1. Simple Random sampling
 Advantages
1. Easy to conduct
2. High probability of achieving a representative sample
3. Meets assumptions of many statistical procedures
 Disadvantages
1. Identification of all members of the population can be
difficult
2. Contacting all members of the sample can be difficult
اسلاید 291
Systematic Random Sample
1. Select a random number, which will be known as
k
2. Get a list of people, or observe a flow of people
(e.g., pedestrians on a corner)
3. Select every kth person
– If every Kth person on the list is, say, rich” or senior” or some
other consistent pattern, avoid this method
اسلاید 293
Example, to select a sample of 25 dorm rooms in your college dorm,
makes a list of all the room numbers in the dorm. For example there
are 100 rooms, divide the total number of rooms (100) by the number
of rooms you want in the sample (25). The answer is 4. This means
that you are going to select every fourth dorm room from the list. First
of all, we have to determine the random starting point. This step can be
done by picking any point on the table of random numbers, and read
across or down until you come to a number between 1 and 4. This is
your random starting point. For instance, your random starting point is
"3". This means you select dorm room 3 as your first room, and then
every fourth room down the list (3, 7, 11, 15, 19, etc.) until you have
25 rooms selected.
اسلاید 295
Stratified Random Sample
طبقه ای
1. Separate your population into groups or strata”
according to some criterion, such as geographic
location, grade level, age, or income.
2. Do either a simple random sample or systematic
random sample from there
a. Note you must know easily what the strata” are
before attempting this
b. If your sampling frame is sorted by, say, school
district, then you’re able to use this method
اسلاید 297
Selecting Random Samples
 Stratified random sampling (continued)
– Advantages
• More accurate sample
• Can be used for both proportional and non-proportional
samples
• Representation of subgroups in the sample
– Disadvantages
• Identification of all members of the population can be
difficult
• Identifying members of all subgroups can be difficult
اسلاید 298
Cluster sampling
خوشه ای
1. Get a list of clusters,” e.g., branches of a
company
2. Randomly sample clusters from that list
3. Have a list of, say, 10 branches
4. Randomly sample people within those branches
a. This method is complex and expensive!


اسلاید 252
Establishing the Validity and Reliability of
a Research Instrument
 Construct validity
– Overall validity encompassing other elements
– Do measurements:
• A. Represent all dimensions of the concept
• B. Distinguish concept from other similar concepts
– Tied to meaning analysis of the concept
• Specifies the dimensions and indicators to be tested
– Assessing construct validity:
– A. Convergent validity
– B. Discriminant validity
اسلاید 254
Convergent validity:
– عبارتست از همبستگی نسبتاً قوی میان سؤالات مربوط به یك حیطه با همان حیطه
– To assess we examine construct loadings and average variance
extracted (AVE)
– Rule of Thumb: Standardized loadings estimates should be .5 or
higher, and ideally .7 or higher.
– AVE should be .5 or greater to suggest adequate convergent
validity
اسلاید 256
Discriminant validity:
– Ability of measure of a concept to discriminate that
concept from other closely related concepts
– Measures of different constructs should not correlate
highly with each other.
– E.g., Measuring Self-esteem construct and Locus-of-control
construct as distinct concepts. Might be correlated but not too
highly or this is an issue.
اسلاید 257
Rule of Thumb: According to Fornell and Larcker (1981),
if the square root of the AVE estimate for each construct is
greater than the correlation between that and all of the
other constructs in the model, then discriminant validity is
demonstrated.
اسلاید 259
 The concept of reliability:
Consistency" or "repeatability" of your measures:
-Reproducibility over time, over different indicators, used by different
interviewers.
Estimates of Reliability
– Statistical coefficients that tell use how consistently we
measured something.
اسلاید 261
 Factors affecting the reliability of a research instrument
– The wording of questions
– The physical setting (In the case of an instrument being used in an interview…)
– The respondent’s mood
– The interviewer’s mood
– The nature of interaction (In an interview situation, the interaction between
the interviewer and the interviewee)
– The regression effect of an instrument (When a research instrument is
used to measure attitudes towards an issue, some respondents, after having
expressed their opinion, may feel that they have been either too negative or too
positive towards the issue. The second time they may express their opinion
differently, thereby affecting reliability.)
اسلاید 262
Methods of determining the reliability of an instrument in
quantitative research
1. External consistency procedures:
Test/retest or repeatability test: This is a commonly used method for
establishing the reliability of a research tool.
An instrument is administered once, and then again, under the same or
similar conditions.
- Advantage: it permits the instrument to be compared with itself
- problem of recall
Parallel forms of the same test: In this procedure you construct two
instruments that are intended to measure the same phenomenon. The two
instruments are then administered to two similar populations.
اسلاید 263
Methods of determining the reliability of an instrument in quantitative
research
2- Internal consistency procedures (The split-half technique,
Cronbach's Alpha (a), Average Inter-item Correlation, Kuder-
Richardson)
در یك پرسشنامه هر خرده مقیاس باید صفت مشابه ای را اندازه بگیرند و سوال دیگری وارد
این مجموعه نگردد.
In split-half reliability we randomly divide all items that purport to
measure the same construct into two sets. We administer the
entire instrument to a sample of people and calculate the total
score for each randomly divided half.
Cronbach's Alpha (): Correlation of each item on the measure all
other items on the measure.
اسلاید 264
 Reliability is a necessary condition for validity -
consistency as an indicator
 Reliability is not a sufficient condition for validity
- consistency does not = accuracy
اسلاید 265
Validity and reliability in qualitative research
– Trochim and Donnelly (2007) compare the criteria proposed by
Guba and Lincoln in the following table with validity and
reliability as defined in quantitative research:
اسلاید 266
Quality of Qualitative Research
 Credibility
– establishing that the results are credible from the perspective of the
participant
 Transferability
– degree to which results can be generalized to other contexts
 Dependability
– description by the researcher of changes within the context that the
research occurs and how these might affect conclusions
 Confirmability
– degree to which others can confirm or corroborate the results
اسلاید 2Validity and Reliability in Qualitative
Research
 Qualitative validity means that the
researcher checks for the accuracy of the
findings by employing certain procedures,
while qualitative reliability indicates that the
researcher’s approach is consistent across
different researchers and different projects
(Gibbs, 2007).67
اسلاید 268
 Validity is one of the strengths of qualitative research and
is based on determining whether the findings are accurate
from the standpoint of the researcher, the participant, or the
readers of an account (Creswell & Miller, 2000).
 Terms abound in the qualitative literature that address
validity, such as trustworthiness, authenticity, and
credibility (Creswell & Miller, 2000), and it is a muchdiscussed
topic (Lincoln, Lynham, & Guba, 2011).
اسلاید 269
Internal Validity in qualitative research
In qualitative research, equates to credibility
 The right setting and informants
 Accurate reflection of situation, informant
perceptions
 Multiple approaches lead to similar results
 Multiple researchers yield similar
interpretations
 Peer review/Informant review
اسلاید 270
 Triangulate different data sources of information by examining
evidence from the sources and using it to build a coherent
justification for themes.
 Use a rich, thick description to convey the findings. This
description may transport readers to the setting and give the
discussion an element of shared experiences. When qualitative
researchers provide detailed descriptions of the setting, for
example, or offer many perspectives about a theme, the results
become more realistic and richer. This procedure can add to
the validity of the findings.
اسلاید 271
 Use an external auditor to review the entire project.
 Spend prolonged time in the field. In this way, the researcher
develops an in-depth understanding of the phenomenon under
study and can convey detail about the site and the people that
lends credibility to the narrative account.
 Self-reflection, acknowledgement of own biases: Clarify the
bias the researcher brings to the study
اسلاید 272
External Validity in qualitative research
(Qualitative generalization)
 In qualitative research, equates to transferability
 Transferability is responsibility of reader,
not researcher
 Provide dense description
 Use nominated informant sample
 Provide detailed demographic and
situational description
اسلاید 273
External Validity in qualitative research
(Qualitative generalization)
External validity is problematic in qualitative
research because In qualitative research, a single
case or small nonrandom sample is selected
precisely because the researcher wishes to
understand the particular in depth, not to find out
what is generally true of the many” (Merriam,
1998, p. 208).
اسلاید 274
 Researcher is the instrument”- how to test for reliability?
 How do qualitative researchers check to determine if their
approaches are reliable (i.e., consistent or stable)?
 Yin (2009) suggested that qualitative researchers need to
document the procedures of their case studies and to
document as many of the steps of the procedures as
possible. He also recommended setting up a detailed case
study protocol and database, so that others can follow the
procedures.
اسلاید 275
Gibbs (2007) suggested several qualitative reliability
procedures:
 Check transcripts to make sure that they do not contain obvious
mistakes made during transcription.
 Make sure that there is not a drift in the definition of codes, a
shift in the meaning of the codes during the process of coding.
 For team research, coordinate the communication among the
coders by regular documented meetings and by sharing the
analysis.
 Cross-check codes developed by different researchers by
comparing results that are independently derived.
اسلاید 276
STEP IV Selecting a Sample
The differences between sampling in
quantitative and qualitative research
- In quantitative research you attempt to select a sample in such a way that it is
unbiased and represents the population from where it is selected.
- In qualitative research, number considerations may influence the selection of a
sample such as: the ease in accessing the potential respondents; your judgement
that the person has extensive knowledge about an episode, an event or a situation
of interest to you; how typical the case is of a category of individuals or simply
that it is totally different from the others.
اسلاید 277
The differences between sampling in
quantitative and qualitative research
- - The determination of sample size: In quantitative research you are guided by a
predetermined sample size. In qualitative research you do not have a
predetermined sample size but during the data collection phase you wait to reach a
point of data saturation
-- Considerable importance is placed on the sample size in quantitative research.
The sample size in qualitative research does not play any significant role as the
purpose is to study only one or a few cases in order to identify the spread of
diversity and not its magnitude.
اسلاید 278
 In quantitative research, randomization is used to avoid
bias in the selection of a sample and is selected in such a
way that it represents the study population. In qualitative
research no such attempt is made in selecting a sample.
You purposely select ‘information-rich’ respondents who
will provide you with the information you need
اسلاید 279
Assumptions of quantitative sampling
We want to generalize to the
population.
Random events are
predictable.
We can compare random Therefore…
events to our results.
Probability sampling is the
best approach.
اسلاید280
Assumptions of qualitative sampling
Social actors are not
predictable like objects.
Randomized events are
irrelevant to social life.
Probability sampling is
expensive and inefficient.
Therefore…
Non-probability sampling is
the best approach.
اسلاید 281.
Sampling in quantitative research
 Sampling is the process of selecting a few (a sample) from a bigger
group (the sampling population) to become the basis for estimating or
predicting the prevalence of an unknown piece of information,
situation or outcome regarding the bigger group.
اسلاید 283
Simple Random Sample
1. Get a list or sampling frame”
a. This is the hard part! It must not
systematically exclude anyone.
b. Remember the famous sampling mistake?
2. Generate random numbers
3. Select one person per random number
اسلاید 287
Selecting Random Samples
1. Simple Random sampling
 Advantages
1. Easy to conduct
2. High probability of achieving a representative sample
3. Meets assumptions of many statistical procedures
 Disadvantages
1. Identification of all members of the population can be
difficult
2. Contacting all members of the sample can be difficult
اسلاید 288
Systematic Random Sample
1. Select a random number, which will be known as
k
2. Get a list of people, or observe a flow of people
(e.g., pedestrians on a corner)
3. Select every kth person
– If every Kth person on the list is, say, rich” or senior” or some
other consistent pattern, avoid this method
اسلاید 290
Systematic sampling
 Example, to select a sample of 25 dorm rooms in your college dorm,
makes a list of all the room numbers in the dorm. For example there
are 100 rooms, divide the total number of rooms (100) by the number
of rooms you want in the sample (25). The answer is 4. This means
that you are going to select every fourth dorm room from the list. First
of all, we have to determine the random starting point. This step can be
done by picking any point on the table of random numbers, and read
across or down until you come to a number between 1 and 4. This is
your random starting point. For instance, your random starting point is
"3". This means you select dorm room 3 as your first room, and then
every fourth room down the list (3, 7, 11, 15, 19, etc.) until you have
25 rooms selected.
اسلاید 292
Stratified Random Sample
طبقه ای
1. Separate your population into groups or strata”
according to some criterion, such as geographic
location, grade level, age, or income.
2. Do either a simple random sample or systematic
random sample from there
a. Note you must know easily what the strata” are
before attempting this
b. If your sampling frame is sorted by, say, school
district, then you’re able to use this method
اسلاید294
Selecting Random Samples
 Stratified random sampling (continued)
– Advantages
• More accurate sample
• Can be used for both proportional and non-proportional
samples
• Representation of subgroups in the sample
– Disadvantages
• Identification of all members of the population can be
difficult
• Identifying members of all subgroups can be difficult
اسلاید 295
Cluster sampling
خوشه ای
1. Get a list of clusters,” e.g., branches of a
company
2. Randomly sample clusters from that list
3. Have a list of, say, 10 branches
4. Randomly sample people within those branches
a. This method is complex and expensive!
اسلاید 298
Nonrandom sampling methods.
There are four commonly used nonrandom
designs, each based on a different
consideration, which are commonly used in
both qualitative and quantitative research.
اسلاید 299
1- The Convenience Sample
 Find some people that are easy to find
 the process of including whoever happens to be
available at the time
– Examples:
• Man on the street”
• Agricultural student in the library
• Volunteer samples
• Patient coming to OP
 …called accidental” or haphazard (hapˈhazərd)” sampling
اسلاید 300
disadvantages…
…difficulty in determining how much of the
effect (dependent variable) results from
the cause (independent variable)


اسلاید 203
Study designs in qualitative research
ETHNOGRAPHY قوم نگاری
– Research tradition in anthropology
– Provides a framework for studying
meanings, patterns, and experiences
defined by a cultural group in a
holistic fashion.
– A description and interpretation of a cultural
or social group or system. The researcher
examines the group’s observable and learned
patterns of behavior, customs, and ways of
life.
اسلاید 204
Study designs in qualitative research
 ETHNOGRAPHY قوم نگاری
– Focus: the culture of a group of people و شناخت الگوهای رفتاری
– گروه خاصی از مردم كه دارای ارزشهای مشترك هستند مثلا معلمان یك موسسه
آموزشی، دانشجویان یك رشته
– Assumption: every human group evolves a culture that guides
members view of the world and the way they structure their
experiences.
– May incorporate quantitative data and archival documents.
– Involves prolonged observation of the group, typically through
participant observation.
– Men's attitudes, beliefs and roles in pregnancy and childbirth: an
Ethnographic Study in Nepal
اسلاید 205
Study designs in qualitative research
Grounded Theory ، نظریه زمینه ای، تئوری بنیادی، داده بنیاد
نظریه بسترزاد، نظریه برخاسته از داده ها
 Is an inductive research technique developed for healthrelated
topics by Glaser & Strauss (1967)
– Grounded” – means the theory developed from the
research is grounded or has it roots in the data from
which is was derived .
– Goal is to develop a theory about the processes (social
behaviour) under investigation in a natural setting
– Useful in areas where little is known or when a new
perspective is needed.
اسلاید 211
Data analysis generates a visual picture, a narrative
statement or a series of hypotheses with a central
phenomenon, causal conditions, context and
consequences.
اسلاید213
Selecting a method of data collection
 Differences in the methods of data collection in
quantitative and qualitative research:
– Most methods of data collection can be used in both
qualitative and quantitative research
– The classification of a method into the quantitative or
qualitative category depends upon your answers to the
following questions:
• What philosophical epistemology is underpinning your
approach to research enquiry?
• How was the information collected? Was it through a
structured or unstructured/flexible format of data collection?
اسلاید 2014
Selecting a method of data collection
– Were the questions or issues discussed during data collection
predetermined or developed during data collection?
– How was the information you gathered recorded? Was it in a
descriptive, narrative, categorical, quantitative form or on a scale?
– How was the information analysed? Was it a descriptive,
categorical or numerical analysis?
– How do you propose to communicate the findings? Do you want to
write in a descriptive or analytical manner?
 For example, if an observation is recorded in a narrative or
descriptive format, it becomes qualitative information, but if it is
recorded in categorical form or on a scale, it will be classified as
quantitative information.
اسلاید 215
Selecting a method of data collection
Major approaches to information gathering
 When you undertake a research study, in most situations, you need to
collect the required information; however, sometimes the information
required is already available and need only be extracted.
1. primary data;
2. secondary data.
اسلاید 217
Selecting a method of data collection
Observation
There are two types of observation:
– 1. participant observation;
– 2. non-participant observation.
Observations can be made under two conditions:
1. natural;
2. controlled.
اسلاید 219
Selecting a method of data collection
 The questionnaire
– A questionnaire is a written list of questions, the answers to
which are recorded by respondents.
A questionnaire can be administered in different ways:
The mailed questionnaire
Collective administration (such as students in a classroom)
Administration in a public place (such as shopping center, health
center)
Forms of question:
1. open-ended question
2. closed question
اسلاید 221
Selecting a method of data collection
 Pre-testing a research instrument
– You should test your research instrument before using
it for actual data collection. A pre-test should be carried
out under actual field conditions on a group of people
similar to your study population.
– The purpose is not to collect data but to identify
problems that the potential respondents might have in
either understanding or interpreting a question.
اسلاید 222
Selecting a method of data collection
Prerequisites for data collection
Before you start obtaining information from potential
respondents it is imperative that you make sure of their:
 motivation to share the required information
 clear understanding of the questions
 possession of the required information
اسلاید 223
Selecting a method of data collection
 Methods of data collection in qualitative research
1. unstructured interviews (such as in-depth
interviewing, focus group interviewing, narratives);
2. participant observation;
3. secondary sources (e.g., Government or semigovernment
publications, Earlier research, Personal
records such as diaries, Mass media such as
newspapers, magazines, the Internet).
اسلاید 226
Let’s write down in our plan our data
collection approach
1) Sites to be studied
2) People to be studied
3) Permissions needed
4) Types of data to be collected
5) Forms needed for data collection
اسلاید 229
Collecting data using attitudinal scales
Attitudinal scales in quantitative research
 In developing an attitudinal scale there are three problems:
1. Which aspects of a situation or issue should be included when seeking
to measure an attitude? For instance, what aspects of teaching should be
included in a scale to find out the attitude of students towards their
lecturer?
2. What procedure should be adopted for combining the different aspects
to obtain an overall picture?
3. How can one ensure that a scale really is measuring what it is supposed
to measure?
اسلاید 230
Collecting data using attitudinal scales
Attitudinal scales in quantitative research
There are three major types of attitudinal
scale:
1. the summated rating scale, also known as the Likert
scale;
2. the equal-appearing interval scale or differential scale,
also known as the Thurstone scale;
3. the cumulative scale, also known as the Guttman scale.
اسلاید 231
Collecting data using attitudinal scales
The summated rating or Likert scale
– The summated rating scale, more commonly known as the
Likert scale, is based upon the assumption that each
statement/item on the scale has equal attitudinal value,
‘importance’ or ‘weight’ in terms of reflecting an attitude towards
the issue in question (it is also the main limitation of this scale).
اسلاید 232
The attitudinal score only places respondents in a position relative to one
another. Remember that the Likert scale does not measure the attitude per se,
but helps you to rate a group of individuals in descending or ascending order
with respect to their attitudes towards the issues in question.
اسلاید 233
 The equal-appearing interval or Thurstone scale
مقیاس فاصله های یكسان نما (ترستون) 
 Unlike the Likert scale, the Thurstone scale calculates a
‘weight’ or ‘attitudinal value’ for each statement.
 The main advantage of this scale is that, as the importance
of each statement is determined by judges, it reflects the
absolute rather than relative attitudes of respondents.
 On the other hand, the scale is difficult to construct, and a major
criticism is that judges and respondents may assess the importance of a
particular statement differently and, therefore, the respondents’
attitudes might not be reflected.
اسلاید 241
Collecting data using attitudinal scales
Attitudes and qualitative research
 in qualitative research you can only explore the spread of
the attitudes. Whatever methods of data collection you use
– in-depth interviewing, focus group, observation – you
can explore the diversity in the attitudes but cannot find
other aspects like: how many people have a particular
attitude, the intensity of a particular attitude, or overall
what the attitude of a person is.
 Qualitative methods are therefore best suited to explore the
diversity in attitudes.
اسلاید 242
Establishing the Validity and Reliability of
a Research Instrument
The concept of validity
According to Kerlinger, ‘Are we measuring what we think we
are measuring?’ (1973: 457). …Reflects the real meaning
اسلاید 243
Types of Validity in quantitative research
1. Translation validity
A. Face validity
B. Content validity
2. Criterion validity
A. Concurrent validity
B. Predictive validity
3. Construct validity
A. Convergent validity
B. Discriminant validity
اسلاید 244
Face Validity
 Face validity: Each question or item on the research instrument
must have a logical link with an objective.
 Subjective expert judgment about what’s there”
 Compare each item to conceptual definition
– If not, it should be dropped
– Is the measure valid on its face”
اسلاید245
Face Validity
 Face validity can be established by having pilot participants ask the
following questions as they overview the survey:
– Is the title of the survey aligned with the purpose of the study? For example, if you
are gathering high school science teachers’ perceptions about curriculum, does the
title of the survey reflect that?
– Are the directions clear, and do they accurately relate the intent for which the
participants should be answering the questions? For example, if the researcher
wants the participants to reflect back on an experience,” is this wordage
specifically stated in the directions?
– Does the overall language and reading level of the survey reflect the ability of the
group for which the survey will be given?
 For example, this self-esteem scale has face validity because the items
(I feel that I have a number of good qualities;” I am able to do things
as well as other people”) appear to assess what we intuitively mean
when we speak of self-esteem.
اسلاید 247
 Content validity: the items and questions cover the full range of the issue
or attitude being measured.
محتوای پرسشنامه در راستای هدف اصلی و سوال پژوهش است؟ 
 Subjective expert judgment of what’s not there”
– Start with conceptual definition and see if all dimensions and traits
are represented at the operational level
– Are some over or underrepresented?
 If current indicators are insufficient, develop more indicators
- cycle of face and content validity
اسلاید 248
Establishing the Validity and Reliability of
a Research Instrument
 Content validity is also judged on the basis of the extent to which
statements or questions represent the issue they are supposed to
measure.


اسلاید 151
The best method — indeed the only fully
compelling method —of establishing causation is
to conduct a carefully designed experiment in
which the effects of possible lurking variables are
controlled. To experiment means to actively
change x and to observe the response in y.
اسلاید 153
Two general criteria of research designs
(Campbell and Stanley (1966):
Internal Validity
External Validity
اسلاید 154
Definition: refers to the extent to which the
changes observed in the DV are caused by
the IV.
Anything that contributes to the control of a
research design contributes to its internal
validity.
اسلاید 155
History: specific events or conditions, other
than the treatment, may occur between the
1st and 2nd measurements of the
participants to produce changes in the DV.
اسلاید 156
Maturation: processes that operate
within the participants simply as a
function of the passage of time.
اسلاید 157
Pre-testing: exposure to a pretest may affect
participants’ performance on a 2nd test,
regardless of the IV.
Measuring instruments: changes in the
measuring instruments, in the scorers, or in
the observers used may produce changes in
the obtained measures.
اسلاید 158
Statistical regression (toward to mean):
Groups having extreme scores on the pretest
(or selected on the basis of extreme scores)
will tend to have scores closer to the mean
on the posttest.
اسلاید 159
Example: In an experiment involving reading
instruction, subjects grouped because of poor pretest
reading scores show considerably greater gain
than do the groups who scored average and high
on the pre-test.
 If a sample is selected on the basis of very low or
high scores, it is possible that at least part of the
DV scores are due to chance.
اسلاید 160
Differential selection of participants:
important differences may exist between the
groups before the IV is applied.
Are the groups equivalent at the beginning
of the study?
اسلاید161
Experimental mortality اثر افت آزمودنیها : occurs when
there is a differential loss of respondents from the
comparison groups.
احتمال كم شدن و از بین رفتن آزمودنی ها بخصوص در تحقیقات تداومی، سبب بروز اشكال در 
ارزشیابی دقیق و صحیح از روایی داخلی تحقیق است.
 Did some participants drop out? Did this affect the results?
 Did about the same number of participants make it through
the entire study in both experimental and comparison
groups?
 Is a threat for any design with more than one group.
اسلاید 162
Selection-maturation interaction:
كنش متقابل بین گزینش و بلوغ، گزینش و تاریخ و مانند اینها
Some of these internal validity threats may
interact. Frequently arises when volunteers
are compared with nonvolunteers.
 If already formed groups are used, one group may profit
more (or less) from the IV (or treatment) because of
maturation, history, or testing factors.
اسلاید 163
Refers to generalizability or representativeness of
the findings.
 Question addressed here is:
To what groups, settings, experimental variables, and
measurement variables can these findings be
generalized?
اسلاید 164
Interaction effect of testing: Pre-testing interacts
with the experimental treatment and causes some
effect such that the results will not generalize to an
untested population.
 Example: In a physical performance experiment,
the pre-test clues the subjects to respond in a
certain way to the experimental treatment that
would not be the case if there were no pre-test.
اسلاید 165
Reactive effects of experimental
arrangements: اثر روشهای تجربی بر متغیر مستقل
An effect that is due simply to the fact that
subjects know that they are participating in an
experiment and experiencing the novelty of it
—the Hawthorne effect.
اسلاید 166
Multiple-treatment interference: تداخل چند متغیر مستقل
When the same subjects receive two or more
treatments as in a repeated measures design,
there may be a carry over effect between
treatments such the results cannot be
generalized to single treatments.
اسلاید 167
Interaction effects of selection biases and the
experimental treatment: An effect of some
selection factor of intact groups interacting with
the experimental treatment that would not be the
case if the groups were randomly selected.
اسلاید168
Types of designs (Campbell & Stanley, 1963)
1. Pre-experimental (descriptive)
2. True experimental
3. Quasi-experimental
اسلاید 169
Weak experimental designs in terms of
control
No random sampling
Threats to internal and external validity are
significant problems
Many definite weaknesses
Example: One-group pretest/posttest design
One-shot case studies,
اسلاید 171
A. One shot case study (One group posttest-only design) (afteronly
design)
(طرح آزمون نهایی و یك گروه آزمودنی)
 For example, a training program is implemented and
participants are given a posttest at the conclusion of the
training.
اسلاید 172
B. One group pre-test-post-test design (before-and after- design)
(طرح آزمون مقدماتی و نهایی و یك گروه آزمودنی)
- One group, not randomly selected nor randomly assigned, is given a
pretest, followed by a treatment/intervention, and finally a posttest.
There is no comparison group.
- دراین طرح متغیر وابسته قبل و بعد ازاجرای متغیر مستقل اندازه گیری می شود.
- زمان استفاده : موقعی كه امكان گزینش تصادفی نباشد
- For example, a classroom teacher gives her students a pretest then
implements an instructional strategy followed by a posttest.
اسلاید 173
C. Static group comparison ( (طرح آزمون نهایی و گروه شاهد، مقایسه گروههای ایستا
 One group which has experienced a treatment/intervention (X) is
compared to another group that has not had the intervention. The
groups are not randomly selected nor randomly assigned and are
generally pre-existing groups. There is no pre-observation/pretest.
 No way to insure equivalence of groups.
 For example, comparison of GRE scores for students who attended a
rural high school versus those who attended an urban high school.
اسلاید 174
Best type of research design because of their
ability to control threats to internal validity
 Utilizes random selection of participants and
random assignment to groups
 Types:
– Pretest-Post-test control group design
– Post-test only control group design
– Solomon Four-Group design
اسلاید 176
Steps in Pre-Test / Post-test Controlled Exp
■ Random sampling of subjects.
■ Random assignment of subjects to comparison or
experimental groups.
■ Administer pre-test to all subjects in both groups.
■ Ensure both groups have same conditions, except that
experimental group receives the treatment.
■ Administer post-test to all subjects in both groups.
■ Assess change in dependent variable from pre-test to
post-test for each group.
اسلاید 1
 Non-randomized, control group, pre-test, post-test
 They lack some of the control of true experimental
designs, but are generally considered to be fine
 Extensively used in the social sciences
– A useful method for measuring social variables
 Types
– Non-equivalent (Nonrandomized) control group pretest-posttest design
طرح آزمون مقدماتی و نهایی با گروه شاهد و بدون استفاده از گزینش تصادفی
– Time series
• One group time series design طرح چند آزمون مقدماتی و نهایی منظم زمانی و یك گروه آزمودنی
• Control group time series design طرح چند آزمون مقدماتی و نهایی منظم زمانی با گروه شاهد
اسلاید 3
The Nonequivalent Groups Design
 The most frequently used in social research
 Try to select groups that are as similar as
possible to compare the treated one with the
comparison one
 e.g. two comparable classrooms or schools
 Cannot be sure whether the groups are comparable
 The groups may be different prior to the study
 Any prior differences between the groups may affect the
outcome of the study
 Require a pretest and posttest
اسلاید 6
Example of Quasi-Experimental Design in Geography
 Baker and White (2003)
– The Effects of GIS on Students’ Attitudes, Self-efficacy, and
Achievement in Middle School Science Classrooms
– Conducted the Nonequivalent quasi-experimental design
• Two eighth grade teachers, across ten classrooms
• Total 192 eighth grade students participated
• Treatment group: used a Web-based GIS application
• Control group: used paper maps
Treatment
Group
Control
Group
Instructor 1 51 36
Instructor 2 42 63
STEP II: Conceptualizing a research design
Advanced Research Methods
اسلاید 9
Factorial Designs
 To compare the effects of two or more independent
variables in the same experiment, cross them.
 Factorial designs enable the researcher to determine the
independent influence of each independent variable, and
the interactive influence of the independent variables.
 Each combination of independent variables is called a
cell.”
 Subjects are randomly assigned to as many groups as there
are cells.
اسلاید 194
What criteria will we use to select a
tradition?
Intent or focus
Audience
Personal training/skills
Personal comfort level with structure
اسلاید 195
– A case can be something relatively concrete such as an organization, a group or an
individual, or something more abstract such as an event, a management decision or
a change program.
– A single case or multiple cases?
– Data collection strategies include direct observation, interviews,
documents, archival records, participant observation, physical
artifacts and audiovisual materials.
اسلاید 197
The purpose of this study was to take a look into education
through the eyes of three teachers who are facing their final year
as professional educators. The overarching goal was to determine
how they have seen children, teachers, administration, policy,
and testing change across the thirty year span of their work as
teachers in Texas’ public schools. Through their comments they
give a considerable amount of insight into the transformation
education has experienced in the last three decades. But
unexpectedly, they reveal as much about our changing society
than they do education itself
اسلاید 198
– Describes the meaning of the lived experience about a
concept or a phenomenon for several individuals.
– Moustakas, 1994, p. 13: to determine what an experience means for
the persons who have had the experience and are able to provide a
comprehensive description of it. From the individual descriptions,
general or universal meanings are derived, in other words, the essences
of structures of the experience.”
اسلاید 199
Phenomonological research
Describes the meaning for several
individuals of their lived experience of a
certain phenomena.
Can center around basic broad questions:
what have you experienced in terms of the
phenomena” and what contexts have
influenced your experience of the
phenomena


اسلاید 51
Is your research question.
 Confirmatory or
predictive in nature?
– If so, use Quantitative
research.
 Exploratory or
interpretive in nature?
– If so, use Qualitative
research.
اسلاید52
Is the available research literature.
 Relatively large?
– If so, use Quantitative
research.
 Limited or nonexistent?
– If so, use Qualitative
research.
اسلاید 53
Do you have skills in.
 Statistics and
deductive reasoning,
and able to write in a
technical and scientific
style?
– If so, use Quantitative
research.
 Inductive reasoning,
attentiveness to detail,
and able to write in a
more literary,
narrative style?
– If so, use Qualitative
research.
اسلاید 54
Choosing the right” method
Different research methods are
appropriate for different research
questions. No single approach is best
for all the questions that can be asked
regarding any particular behavioral
phenomenon.
اسلاید55
What leads some students to be more
successful readers than other students?”
 Can I predict who is likely to have reading difficulties?”
(Correlation/regression)
 What is the best method of teaching reading?”
(Experiment)
 What are the norms for a population for the
development of reading skill?” (Descriptive)
 What are the conditions of reading instruction and
learning in today’s classrooms?” (Qualitative)
اسلاید 60
An eight step model:
Steps in planning a research study
Step I: formulating a research problem
Step II: conceptualizing a research design
Step III: constructing an instrument for data collection
Step IV: selecting a sample
Step V: writing a research proposal
Steps in conducting a study
Step VI: collecting data.
Step VII: processing data
Step VIII: writing a research report
اسلاید67
STEP I: Formulating a research problem
Reviewing the literature
Formulating a research problem
Identifying variables
Constructing hypotheses
اسلاید 68
Reviewing the literature
Place of literature review in research
•It provides a theoretical background to your study.
•It reviews the means by which you establish the links between what
you are proposing to examine and what has already been studied. In
other words, it helps you to refine your research methodology.
•Through the literature review you are able to show how your findings
have contributed to the existing body of knowledge in your
profession.
•It enables you to contextualize your findings.
اسلاید 69
Reviewing the literature
 It also helps you to:
– bring clarity and focus to your research problem;
– improve your methodology;
– broaden your knowledge base in your research area.
– contextualize your findings.
اسلاید 70
Reviewing the literature
Procedure for reviewing the literature
There are four steps involved in conducting a
literan1re review:
1. search for existing literature in your area of study;
2. review the literature selected;
3. develop a theoretical framework;
4. develop a conceptual framework.
اسلاید 82
Reviewing the literature
2- Review the literature selected
– Note whether the knowledge relevant to your theoretical framework has
been confirmed beyond doubt.
– Note the theories put forward, the criticisms of these and their basis, the
methodologies adopted (study design, sample size and its characteristics,
measurement procedures, etc.) and the criticisms of them.
– Examine to what extent the findings can be generalized to other situations.
– Notice where there are significant differences of opinion among
researchers and give your opinion about the validity of these differences.
– Ascertain the areas in ,which little or nothing is known-the gaps that exist
in the body of knowledge.
اسلاید 83
Develop a theoretical framework
– your theoretical framework provides you ,with.
a guide as you read
اسلاید 84
3- Develop a theoretical framework
 Your theoretical framework refers to the underlying
theoretical approach that you adopt to underpin your study.
اسلاید 85
4- Develop a conceptual framework
The conceptual frame stems from the theoretical framework and
concentrates, usually, on one section of that theoretical framework
which becomes the basis of your study.
The latter consists of the theories or issues in which your study is
embedded, whereas the former describes the aspects you selected from
the theoretical framework to become the basis of your inquiry.
The conceptual framework is the basis of your research problem.
The conceptual framework defines and organizes the concepts important
within your study.
اسلاید 87
The research problem
– The first and most important step of the research
process.
– The research problem serves as the foundation of a
research study: if it is well formulated, you can expect a
good study to follow.
– If one wants to solve a problem, one must generally
know what the problem is. It can be said that a large
part of the problem lies in knowing what one is trying
to do (Kerlinger,1986: 17).
اسلاید 88
Formulating a research problem
Sources of research problems
– Most research in the humanities revolves
around four Ps:
• People (individuals, organisations, groups, communities)
• Problems (i.e. issues, situations, associations, needs, population,
composition, profile, etc.)
• Programs (i.e. structure, contents, outcomes, attributes, satisfaction,
consumers, and service provider.)
• Phenomena (cause and effect relationship, and the study of a given
phenomenon itself.)
اسلاید89
Formulating a research problem
 Sources of research problems
– Every research study has two aspects:
1. the study population;
2. the subject area.
اسلاید 90
Formulating a research problem
 Considerations in selecting a research problem
– Interest
– Magnitude (Not too broad or too big, Not too narrow, Manageable,
specific and clear)
– Measurement of concepts
– level of expertise
– relevance (contributes to the improvement and understanding of educational theory and
practice, Relevant to your area of professional),
– availability of data
– ethical issues (Do no harm to person/society involved)
اسلاید91
Formulating a research problem
 Steps in the formulation of a research problem
1. Identify a broad field or subject area of interest to you.
2. Dissect the broad area into subareas.
3. Select what is of most interest to you.
4. Raise research questions.
5. Formulate objectives.
6. Assess your objectives.
7. Double-check.
اسلاید95
The formulation of objectives
– Objectives are the goals you set out to attain in
your study.
– Objectives should be listed under two headings:
• main objective: an overall statement of the thrust of
your study
• Sub-objectives: the specific aspects of the topic that
you want to investigate witl1in the main framework
of your study
اسلاید 97
Establishing operational definitions
– In defining the proble1n you may use certain
words or items that are difficult to measure
and/or the understanding of which may vary
from respondent to respondent.
– Example: the main objectives are:
• to find out the number of children living below the poverty line in Australia;
• to ascertain the impact of immigration on fami1y roles among immigrants.
• to measure the effectiveness of a retraining program designed to help young
people.
اسلاید 99
Example of Establishing Operational
Definitions
Main objective – to find out the number of
children living below the poverty line in
Bangkok
– Define the word poverty line”
– Define the word Children”



اسلاید8
Research is the systematic process of collecting and
analysing information (data) in order to increase our
understanding of the phenomenon with which we
are concerned or interested.
 Research involves three main stages:
planning
data collection
analysis.
اسلاید 9
Research: A way of thinking
Originates with a question or problem.
– It is a habit of questioning what you do, and a
systematic examination of the observed information to
find answers, with a view to instituting appropriate
changes for a more effective professional service.
Research is one of the ways to find answers
to your questions.
اسلاید10
The questions about any profession can be
considered from four different perspectives
اسلاید 11
The research process:
– Is being undertaken within a framework of a set
of philosophies;
– Uses procedures, methods and techniques that
have been tested for their validity and
reliability;
– Is designed to be unbiased and objective
اسلاید12
Controlled
Rigorous
Systematic
Valid and verifiable
Empirical (Conclusions must be based on hard evidence collected
from real-life experiences or observation)
Critical scrutiny (the process of investigation must be
foolproof and free from any drawbacks)
اسلاید22
– Identifying the problem
– Formulating a hypothesis
– Developing the research plan
– Collecting and analyzing the data
– Interpreting results and forming conclusions
اسلاید24
Research method & methodology
Research methods: All those
methods/techniques that are used for
conduction of research.
Research methods or techniques, thus, refer
to the methods the researchers use in
performing research operations.
اسلاید25
Research method & methodology
Research methodology is a way to
systematically solve the research problem.
It may be understood as a science of
studying how research is done scientifically.
 Thus, when we talk of research methodology we not only
talk of the research methods but also consider the logic
behind the methods we use in the context of our research
study and explain why we are using a particular method or
technique and why we are not using others.
اسلاید26
Types of research
Research can be classified from three
perspectives:
1. Application of the research study
2. Objectives in undertaking the research
3. Inquiry mode employed
اسلاید35
Explanatory research -3 تحقیق تبیینی
- It attempts to clarify why and how there is a
relationship between two aspects of a situation or
phenomenon.
- How technology affects unemployment?
اسلاید 37
Although, theoretically, a research study can be
classified in one of the mentioned perspectives, in
practice most studies are a combination of the
three categories (descriptive, correlational and
explanatory research.
اسلاید39
In general, there are two approaches to find
answers to your research questions:
1- The structured approach (quantitative research):
everything (objectives, design, sample, …) is predetermined.
More appropriate to determine the extent of a problem, issue
or phenomenon.
(positivism) " "اثبات گر
2- The unstructured approach (qualitative research): it allows
flexibility in all aspects of the process. More appropriate to
explore its nature. ) " پسا اثبات گرا »post positivism
اسلاید40
The choice of a quantitative or qualitative mode of inquiry,
should depend upon:
1. Aim of your inquiry- exploration, confirmation or
quantification.
2. Use of the findings-policy formulation or process
understanding.
اسلاید 41
Different Ways of Looking at Things
Quantitative
– Positivistic
– Epistemological basis is Realism
– Dates to the Age of Enlightenment
Qualitative
– Naturalistic (Post-Positivistic)
– Epistemological basis is Idealism
– Dates informally to prehistoric times
Formally to ancient Greece
اسلاید 44
QUANTITATIVE
– Hypothesis: All beans
are alike.
– NULL: No beans are
different.
– Method: Count the
beans.
 QUALITATIVE
– Question: What is a
bean? What does it
mean to be a bean?
– Method: Examine
beanness” in the field.
اسلاید 45
QUANTITATIVE
– to explain and predict
– to test, confirm, and
validate theory
 QUALITATIVE
– to describe and explain
– to explore and interpret
– to build theory
اسلاید 46
QUANTITATIVE
– focused
– deals with known
variables
– uses established
guidelines
– static designs; contextfree;
objective
 QUALITATIVE
– holistic approach
– unknown variables
– flexible guidelines
– emergent” design;
context-bound;
– subjective
اسلاید 47
QUANTITATIVE
– deductive analysis
• from general case
(theory”) to specific
situations.
 QUALITATIVE
– inductive analysis
• from specific situation
to general case.
اسلاید 48
QUANTITATIVE
– Numerical data
– Statistics
– Formal and scientific
 QUALITATIVE
– Narrative description
– Words, quotes
– Personal voice; literary
اسلاید 49
Which approach to educational
research (or social sciences)
should you use?
اسلاید 50
There is an objective
reality that can be
measured?
– If so, use Quantitative
research.
 There are multiple,
constructed realities
that defy easy
measurement or
categorization?
– If so, use Qualitative
research?



آخرین ارسال ها

آخرین جستجو ها

مرجع رسمي معرفي شرکت توليد محتوا و نحوه توليد محتوا ام پی فایل - مرجع خرید فایل های دانشگاهی Philothinkers وبلاگ شخصی ایمان رسولی اخبار شرکت آب و فاضلاب شهری و روستا - آبفای ایران طراحي و بهينه سازي سايت mahtabvectora سفر موسيقي smsaria